JANUARY 8, 2010
This Week in Health Care Reform
While still technically in recess, members of Congress trickled back to Washington, D.C. this week to get a jump start on reconciling the health care reform bills passed by the House and Senate last year.
On Tuesday, Democratic leaders began conversations around a final package, pledging to overcome differences and aiming to have a bill passed by the President Barack Obama's State of the Union Address, anticipated in early February. Members of the news media, however, have highlighted the difficult negotiations ahead, given some major differences in the proposed packages and the time pressure being imposed by President Obama.
We continue to encourage you and others to engage members of Congress during this debate by visiting the Health Action Network.
Health Reform Negotiations
Senate Passes Reform Bill: At 7:05 a.m. on Christmas Eve, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), along with 59 other Senate members, voted to pass reform legislation that, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), would expand health coverage to approximately 31 million people at a cost of $871 billion over 10 years. The bill passed on party lines (60-39), without a single Republican vote in favor. Republicans believe the bill would impose many regulatory and financial burdens on taxpayers and businesses while increasing government debt.
Reconciliation Poses Difficult Road Ahead: Before lawmakers can present a final health care reform bill to President Obama, the approved Senate bill needs to be merged with the House version passed in November 2009, which extends coverage to 36 million Americans at a cost of about $1 trillion. However, the bills have some major differences that will need to be addressed as lawmakers shape the final package, including:
- Insurance market reform and exchanges - Both bills would bar insurers from denying coverage to those with pre-existing conditions and from dropping coverage for those who get sick. Both would also create insurance exchanges through which small businesses and individuals could shop for insurance. The Senate bill would create state-based exchanges, however, whereas the House bill would create a national exchange with an option for states to run state-based programs if they meet certain requirements.
- The government-run plan - A government-run plan was a central component to the House bill. The Senate bill would instead direct the U.S. Office of Personnel Management to contract with private insurance companies to offer policies on the exchanges. Despite much commotion over the need to include the public option, House leaders conceded Tuesday that they may be willing to agree to a bill without a public option if other parts of the bill fulfill the same goals, with the hope of expanding available subsidies.
- Reform financing - Members of the House would pay for the reform effort - which carries a price tag of about $1 trillion - through a 5.4 percent surtax on individuals making more than $500,000 a year and couples making more than $1 million and by imposing a 2.5 percent excise tax on medical devices. Members of the Senate, on the other hand, plan to pay for their $871 billion plan through several measures:
- a 40 percent excise tax on high-cost health insurance plans;
- an increase in payroll taxes for Medicare on individuals making more than $200,000 a year and couples making more than $250,000 per year;
- fees on insurers, medical device manufacturers and drug companies;
- and, a 10 percent tax on indoor tanning salons.
On Wednesday, President Obama expressed his preference for the insurance tax contained in the Senate bill, but the excise tax is strongly opposed by labor unions.
- Coverage Mandates - Both bills require that individuals obtain health insurance and impose a penalty on those who do not. The House bill also includes an employer mandate for companies with payrolls above $750,000. The Senate bill does not include this mandate but would require companies with more than 50 employees to pay a fine if employees obtain federally subsidized coverage on the insurance exchange.
- Medicaid expansion - Both bills expand Medicaid. The Senate bill makes Medicaid available to those with incomes up to 133 percent of the poverty level, whereas the House allows for coverage for those with incomes up to 150 percent of the poverty level.
- Abortion - While both bills bar the use of federal funds for abortions, the House bill includes stricter language requiring anyone seeking abortion coverage to buy separate insurance riders. The Senate bill would let the states choose whether or not to include plans with abortion coverage in the insurance exchange and would require those with abortion coverage to write a separate check for this insurance.
President Obama Pushes Swift Action: In a meeting at the White House Tuesday, President Obama encouraged House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD), as well as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL), who participated via phone, to bypass the traditional conference committee used to negotiate reconciliation, in the interest of time. The move, which creates a three-way negotiating construct involving top Democrats in the House and Senate and the White House, will exclude Republican lawmakers from the debate and reduce their ability to delay the voting.
Further, President Obama indicated that he would be taking a hands-on approach to the final stages of the negotiations. The President held another meeting with leading Democrats on Wednesday to help iron out differences between the House and Senate bills. Democrats also held a noon meeting and conference call on Thursday to discuss how reconciliation will proceed and some of the priorities for the final bill.
C-SPAN Calls for Transparency: Noting that President Obama mentioned several times during his campaign that health care negotiations would be transparent and broadcasted on C-SPAN, Brian Lamb, C-SPAN CEO, sent a letter to House and Senate leaders on December 30 asking for negotiations to be opened up for public viewing. Republicans pointed out that the most critical discussions on health reform have taken place behind closed doors so far. Top House Democrats deflected the C-SPAN request, saying the process has been highly transparent through more than 100 public hearings held by the House. They pledged to make the final stages transparent in part via the Internet.
Opponents Question Constitutionality: On Wednesday, December 30, Republican attorneys general in 13 states - including Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Michigan and Virginia - sent a letter to Sens. Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid stating that Congressional leaders must remove the amendment exempting Nebraska from having to pay for the state's Medicaid expansion. The prosecutors are calling the deal unconstitutional and threatened legal action. Members of the news media report that South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster and Oklahoma top prosecutor Drew Edmondson are asking attorneys general across the country to call on Sens. Pelosi and Reid to remove the provision.
In addition, a contingency of legal scholars as well as many Republican lawmakers are calling the measures passed by both the House and the Senate unconstitutional , primarily due to the inclusion of an individual mandate. "In the history of this country, the federal government has never required every American to enter into a contract with a private company," said Randy Barnett, a professor of constitutional law at Georgetown University Law Center.
Formal sessions in Congress are scheduled to begin January 19, 2010. Sen. Pelosi, however, plans to continue to work with key committee chairs and other Democratic leaders prior to the official sessions..